Users spent more on apps in 2016, with games and entertainment apps major the way

The quantity of cash U.S. users are spending on iPhone apps is steadily climbing, but 1 category in certain saw important development last year: Entertainment apps. The category – home to streaming services like Netflix, Hulu and HBO NOW – saw consumers’ average spending boost by 130 percent year-over-year, according to a new report from app intelligence firm Sensor Tower.

The findings point to people’s developing interest in cord cutting and streaming Tv services – a trend which has currently observed many of these apps scoring a spot as 1 of 2016’s most significant apps by income. HBO, for example, recently announced its app for cord cutters HBO NOW had grown to more than two million subscribers – a lot more than doubling its user base from the year prior. 

Netflix also saw its iOS customer base increase because it launched an in-app subscription providing back in Q4 2015. The app contributed approximately $ 7.9 million in gross income throughout its launch quarter, and that figure grew to far more than $ 58 million by the last quarter of 2016, Sensor Tower estimates.


Subscription services impacted the development in other iOS categories as nicely, the firm found. For example, the Photo &amp Video category benefitted from the development of YouTube’s subscription service, YouTube Red. Photo &amp Video, which is YouTube’s main category, saw its U.S. App Retailer income per active iPhone grow from $ .30 to $ .70 from 2015 to 2016.

Meanwhile, the Social Networking category increased from $ 1.80 to $ 2.00. Perhaps not coincidentally, this is also exactly where you can uncover Tinder, the well-liked dating app which launched its subscription providing in early 2015. Tinder was also one particular of the top apps by revenue last year.

The Music category grew from $ three.40 to $ 3.60, likely impacted by the gains made by its own best apps Spotify and Pandora, both of which supply a selection of subscription tiers to their customers.

Nevertheless, the category that contributes the most to App Store’s bottom line continues to be games. In 2016, much more than 80 % of the U.S. App Store income was generated by the Games category, notes the report.


U.S. iPhone owners spent an average of $ 27 per device on games last year, up from $ 25 in 2015.

Even though spending enhanced, the category saw per-device installs decline last year, going from 10.five in 2015 to 9.9 in 2016. That seems to imply that customers have been spending more money in fewer games – possibly a side impact of the Pokémon Go phenomenon.

Social networking apps also saw fewer installs in 2016 (two.three on typical, down from three.three), but the remaining categories didn’t see such significant declines.

The reality that installs by category dropped across the board, nevertheless, indicates that customers are sticking with established apps, while newcomers are getting a harder time obtaining accomplishment.


Yes the UK now has a law to log web users’ browsing behavior, hack devices and limit encryption

2016 has been a very good year to bury very negative news. And political distractions maybe clarify why a bill that has been described as the most extreme surveillance legislation every single passed in a democracy has these days passed into law in the UK never having faced substantial opposition.

It will come into force next year, soon after emergency surveillance legislation put in spot by the prior coalition government, with even less parliamentary scrutiny than the IP bill was afforded, sunsets at the end of December.

The Investigatory Energy Act, as it now is, creates an updated framework for state surveillance capabilities, enshrining in law investigatory powers that had previously been authorized in the shadows, by means of a patchwork of obscure legislative clauses.

Some capabilities were only avowed in parliament in current years, following the 2013 Snowden disclosures — and deemed by the UK intelligence agencies’ personal oversight court to have been illegally operated as a outcome.

The new law also brings in a new requirement: that communications service providers harvest and retain logs of the digital solutions accessed by all their customers for a complete year. This log is accessible to a wide-range of government agencies, not just law and intelligence agencies. Access to the log does not require a warrant.

Although combating terrorism has been the government’s explanation for the require for the surveillance powers set out in the legislation, they have never ever adequately explained how a senior exec functioning in fraud and error solutions at the Department for Function and Pensions, for instance, may well be actively engaged in a War on Terror.

Privacy issues are not the only problem either. A enormous security concern is what the legislation implies for encryption — offered it hands UK authorities the energy to call for a business remove encryption. Or limit the rollout of end-to-end encryption on a future service. Raising the specter of backdoors damaging trust in UK companies — as properly as risking the safety of user data.

The law also sanctions state hacking of devices, networks and solutions, like bulk hacking on foreign soil. And makes it possible for the safety agencies to keep massive databases of personal data on U.K. citizens, which includes individuals suspected of no crime. Concerns stay over how data harvested by domestic intelligence agencies might be shared with foreign equivalent agencies in other countries (and therefore vice versa, as a workaround for any domestic surveillance limits).

The government claims a ‘double lock’ authorization method that loops in the judiciary to signing off intercept warrants for the very first time in the UK, along with senior ministers, bolsters against the danger of the “most intrusive investigatory powers” being misused. Critics question this, arguing judges will just be rubberstamping warrants on process, not interrogating the proportionality of the substance.

The oversight court for UK intelligence agencies also has however to rule on the proportionality of the law’s so-referred to as bulk measures — it’s due to do that subsequent month, when it will also be ruling on the legality of the powers with the wider European Union context. Rather also late to be factored into the IP bill’s parliamentary scrutiny, nonetheless.

Challenges to the legislation at the European level are most likely, given European courts have ruled against bulk collection. Despite the fact that the UK’s future within the EU is now crowned by a Brexit query mark — so regardless of whether UK law will be bound by any European legal judgements condemning the new surveillance law remains to be seen.

A petition to parliament to repeal the IP Act has currently passed a lot more than 140,000 signatures — exceeding the one hundred,000 signature threshold exactly where parliament must think about debating a petition. But given the lack of debate in parliament the very first time round it’s tough to see the majority of MPs who backed the bill all of a sudden waking up to the reality they sleepwalked into a surveillance state…

Featured Image: r. nial bradshaw/Flickr Beneath A CC BY 2. LICENSE