New Years 2017 was the most significant App Retailer day ever with $240M in purchases

Now that 2016 is more than, some businesses are taking time to appear back and recap how they fared last year. And now Apple has shared some stats showing us how the App Shop did.

New Year’s Day 2017 was the single greatest day ever on the App Store – with iOS users spending virtually $ 240 million on apps. This is a little bit surprising, because you’d feel Christmas day is when people get new iOS devices and would buy the most apps.

For comparison, the company paid out a total of $ 20 billion to developers in the course of all of 2016, which itself is is a 40% enhance from final year. It also signifies that a total of $ 60 billion has been paid out to developers given that the App Shop launched in 2008 – with one third of that happening in just the final year.

In terms of exactly where this revenue came from, the U.S, China, Japan and the UK were the prime grossing global markets.

And China especially saw 90% development year-more than-year, which is a good sign for Apple. The Chinese marketplace is a important focus for the company’s international growth method, and it is a great sign that Chinese customers are not only downloading a lot more apps, but also spending a lot more money on them. Speaking of China – the two highest-grossing app developers were Tencent and NetEase, each companies primarily based in the area.

In 2016 the App Store’s subscription service grew to $ 2.7 billion, a 74% enhance over 2015. Netflix, HBO Now, Line, Tinder and At Bat were the most common subscription solutions on the App Shop.

Lastly the business announced that there are now 21,000 apps on the iMessage App Store, which hopefully is a sign that developers are continuing to construct for the platform. For iMessage apps to truly thrive more than the lengthy term developers will require to move beyond the sticker apps and start off obtaining inventive – implementing factors like payments and video chat into iMessage apps – anything we’re now beginning to see.


What Trump’s Most current Picks Imply for the Ag Market

This story originally appeared on Mother Jones and is element of the Climate Desk collaboration.

In the course of the campaign, President-elect Donald Trump’s agriculture advisers had a hard row to hoe: They had to assure farm-state Republicans that Trump’s constant tirades against trade wouldn’t hurt a farm economy that relies increasingly on exports, by mouthing vague platitudes about the great “deals” the candidate would reduce with key trading partners like China. They also stressed Trump’s disdain for the regulation of farming practices, vowing he’d bring the Environmental Protection Agency to heel.

On Wednesday, the incoming chief executive showed his willingness to make very good on his promises to keep ag exports booming and gut environmental regulations on farms. Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad, Trump’s choose to serve as ambassador to China, has been promoting trade amongst his state’s massive hog and soybean farms and China considering that the 1980s, when Branstad served the 1st of his two stints as governor. Then there’s Scott Pruitt, Trump’s selection to run the EPA. The Oklahoma attorney general is most well-known for his climate modify skepticism and ties to the oil sector, but he’s also tightly aligned with his state’s farm interests.

Here’s a quick rundown of why Trump’s massive Wednesday personnel selections amount to twin gifts to Big Ag.

• Branstad is enmeshed with Iowa’s agribusiness interests. His chief patron is Bruce Rastetter, CEO of the sprawling Summit Agriculture Group, a major Iowa pork and ethanol producer with interests in Brazil. Politico describes Rastetter an “agribusiness mogul who’s produced a fortune in pork, ethanol and farm true estate.” Branstad credits Rastetter with convincing him to run for Iowa governorship in 2010. (Branstad had previously served as governor from 1983 to 1999.) Rastetter then backed up the notion by plying the candidate with $ 164,875 in donations in 2010—Branstad’s most significant contributor that year. (His second greatest contributor, at $ 152,000, was Eldon Roth, CEO of Beef Items International, maker of “lean finely textured beef,” recognized in some quarters as “pink slime.”)

As soon as elected, Branstad rapidly raised hackles by appointing his patron to the University of Iowa’s board of regents. Rastetter now serves as president of the university’s board, and his tenure has been marked by steady controversy (see right here, and right here). His business, Summit, was “awarded $ 480,000 in no-interest loans from an Iowa State University center a handful of months following he joined the school’s governing board,” the Des Moines Register reports. He also “pursued a deal with the Tanzanian government that would have employed Iowa State University’s experience to create farmland there and, in the original proposal, would have displaced refugees,” the Register adds. The university ended up backing away from the strategy after controversy around the refugees erupted. Via it all, Branstad resisted activist calls to “fire Rastetter” from his perch on the regents board.

Branstad wasn’t happy just to appoint one particular generous Rastetter to a potent state board. Back in 2011, the governor also tapped Rastetter’s brother Brent, who then ran a business constructing industrial-scale hog-rearing facilities and who also contributed to Branstad’s campaign, to the state’s Environmental Protection Commission. Branstad also signed into law one particular of those infamous “ag gag” bills, championed by Big Ag, that make it a crime to secretly document situations inside livestock farms.

When Branstad is installed as ambassador to China, Iowa’s ag interests will have a robust advocate pushing to keep exports flowing east. Just last month, the governor led a trade mission there, traveling with the heads of the Iowa Pork Producers Association and Iowa Beef Sector Council. And that’s crucial—with US meat consumption growing slowly, China has emerged as a key market for the handful of businesses that dominate US meat production, as I show here. Certainly, the largest US pork producer, Smithfield, is now a Chinese-owned business.

• Oklahoma’s Pruitt, quickly to take responsibility for executing US environmental policy, is also quite a piece of function. The EPA is currently under heavy criticism for weak regulation of pollution from the very sort of massive-scale, concentrated livestock favored by Branstad and his patron Rastetter in Iowa. Like Iowa, Oklahoma has a heavy concentration of large-scale, confined animal operations—see Food and Water Watch’s “Factory Farm Map” for the state. Pruitt, too, is deeply connected with his state’s agriculture interests, and has thundered against EPA farm regulations.

To be fair, Pruitt is hostile to the EPA in its entirety, not just in its capacity as a watchdog of farm pollution. On his LinkedIn web page, Pruitt boasts that he’s a “leading advocate against the EPA’s activist agenda.” But although his ties to the fossil fuel sector are well known, his chumminess with his state’s ag interests are also worth noting. This year, he hotly supported State Question 777, informally identified as a “right to farm” law, which would have restricted efforts by the state or localities to regulate farms—a blatant try to shield large-scale operations. The initiatives’s supporters, led by the Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance coverage Co. and the Oklahoma Pork Council, spent about $ 1 million promoting it. Opponents, led by the Humane Society of the US, also spent about $ 1 million.

Oklahoma voters shot down the measure by a 60-40 margin, but it didn’t drop for lack of effort by Pruiitt. Back in 2014, Pruitt launched an investigation of of the Humane Society, which was organizing opposition to the Correct to Farm proposal. In 2015, HSUS hit back, suing Pruitt for what it referred to as a “nearly yearlong campaign of political harassment and public vilification” against the animal welfare group. HSUS ultimately dropped the suit following the attorney general’s workplace announced it was no longer investigating HSUS.

Meanwhile, Pruitt’s relations with meat sector interests flourished. In August 2015, the Oklahoma Cattlemen’s Association honored him with its Distinguished Service Award, offered to “individuals who have contributed to the success of the OCA and the Oklahoma beef cattle industry.”

And just final month, days just before the presidential election, he keynoted the Oklahoma Farm Bureau’s annual convention. In his speech, he lambasted EPA overreach, complaining that the agency is “affecting farmers and ranchers, it’s affecting oil and gas.”

About that: Farmers and ranchers are certainly suffering—but government overreach is the least of their troubles.


Go Back to Prime. Skip To: Begin of Post.


Zero&#039s most recent electric motorcycles boast 200+ mile variety

Zero boasts that the Zero S and Zero SR models are the world’s 1st production electric motorcycles to exceed that milestone, but says that owners will only get that type of overall performance when riding in the city. The company’s option Power Tank accessory, which does the heavy lifting, also gives sufficient juice for over one hundred miles on the highway. For those in search of instant torque, Zero has improved its Z-Force powertrain and incorporated interior permanent magnet (IPM) motors, resulting in greater acceleration and 116-ft-lb of torque.

To guarantee that riders worry much more about riding than keeping their bike serviced, Zero is also debuting a new free mobile app that offers functionality customization — such as settings for maximum torque, leading speed and regenerative braking. It also lets owners update their motorcycle’s firmware, saving a trip to the dealer. Oh, and each and every lithium-ion battery is backed by a 5-year, limitless mileage warranty.

Zero says the 2017 models are currently generating their way to dealers and will retail for in between $ 8,495 and $ 15,995. US buyers will also receive a ten % federal tax credit on best of any state incentives. That added range will cost, though, with the Power Tank setting clients back an added $ 2,695.

Engadget RSS Feed