The Best Tweets of the 2017 Golden Globes—From Meryl to Moonlight

Brought to you by the Hollywood Foreign Press Association and champagne, the Golden Globe Awards are very easily the most cost-free-wheeling show of trophy season. Each January, celebrities dress up, get drunk, and at times even trade the platitudes for candor. This year’s show was no diverse, with legendary acceptance speeches jockeying for attention alongside media screwups and flashes of actual, organic spontaneity. But if you happened to miss it—or just want to relive the highlights—the massively crowdsourced recap identified as Twitter is happy to support.

The Best Tweets of the 2017 Golden Globe Awards

Ahead of the show even began, the red carpet offered more than a couple of awkward moments—one in certain that became a recurring theme. When interviewing Pharrell Williams, who developed and contributed music for the film Hidden Figures, Jenna Bush referred to the film as “Hidden Fences.” Fences is another film that snagged Globe nominations—but while it’s the adaptation of a hugely famous play that won a Pulitzer when it came out 30 years ago, it also has a largely black cast, which made Bush’s stumble a tiny more egregious.

Blunders aside, the red carpet was full of the usual ogling and awkwardness.

Meanwhile, these hoping to stream the show got a massive surprise from its home network. Good operate, Peacock!

Ultimately, the ceremony began…

…with a musical number that felt like one big, sloppy fan-service kiss to Television.

Jimmy Fallon kicked off his monologue with a TelePrompter malfunction and a quantity of shots at the incoming POTUS. Not absolutely everyone was feeling the newfound friskiness from the guy who so (in)famously tousled Donald Trump’s hair on his show final year.

The awards started going out—with a few surprises in the mix. To kick things off, Aaron Taylor-Johnson (Kick-Ass, Godzilla) won for his supporting turn in Nocturnal Animals. Not the outcome numerous individuals had been expecting.

Then Tracee Ellis Ross, Atlanta, and Sarah Paulson won and—in the eyes of Twitter, at least—things got back on track.

Things started dragging a bit after that, though Hugh Laurie came with the Lauriest speech that ever Lauried.

Not each and every bit went more than properly, of course.

OK, so don’t forget that issue we said about “Hidden Fences”? Nicely, this occurred.

Presenters kept presenting, and La La Land kept winning.

Meanwhile, “Hidden Fences” only gained traction.

Then it was back to the awards.

In what will likely be the most talked about moment of the evening, Meryl Streep took to the stage to accept the Cecil B. DeMille award—and went following President-elect Donald Trump. Challenging.

Then Donald Glover was back, this time winning for his acting in Atlanta.

But La La Land wasn’t fairly finished winning each and every. Single. Award.

Oh, and Brad Pitt showed up!

And Casey Affleck won for Manchester By the Sea.

Isabelle Huppert took home a surprising win for Elle, beating out the likes of Natalie Portman, Amy Adams, and Jessica Chastain.

In the end, following getting shut out all night, Moonlight took residence an award for Very best Motion Image, Drama.

All round, there weren’t too numerous surprises. La La Land is specifically the kind of film the HFPA loves, and just about everything else people were hoping to see win managed to nab a Globe or two. Except, that is, for the network that brought us Game of Thrones, The Evening OfWestworld, and Insecure.

See you next year, all!

Go Back to Prime. Skip To: Begin of Post.

WIRED

2016’s best programming trends

Last January I wrote a TechCrunch post predicting the key programming trends of 2016.

But in the software program development planet, issues can adjust very quickly. It can be challenging to see the higher-level trends clearly by means of all the chatter about shiny new development languages, frameworks and tools.

So, as we near the end of 2016, how precise were my predictions?

Development of the newest version of JavaScript

JavaScript/ECMAScript version 6 (commonly identified as ECMAScript 2015 or ES6) launched in June of 2015, and I predicted that 2016 would see widespread adoption of its new functions as net developers adjusted to the new version of this internet normal. I was mostly appropriate. All the major browsers and Node.js (an open-supply JavaScript runtime) are a lot more than 90 percent ES6-compliant. Nowadays, we see drastically far more ES6 syntax in production and not just internal utilities and smaller sized low-stakes systems, but the principal client-facing systems, as effectively. Organizations not dependent on legacy customers, like Airbnb and Google, are enforcing ES6 syntax in their internal style guides.

Even so, ES6 has not been universally adopted. Some developers want to assistance the old version of JavaScript for legacy causes. Developers who want to use ES6 notation but nevertheless want to reach customers utilizing legacy browsers can use tools such as transpilers or polyfills to convert contemporary ES6 code to the older syntax. Also, some ES6 attributes have not been totally implemented in every single JavaScript environment, such as suitable tail-recursion (Safari ten and iOS 10 are content exceptions). This table is a fantastic resource to see if your target platform is ES6-compliant. The old version of JavaScript isn’t going to disappear overnight, but we saw important growth in ES6 usage over 2016, and I count on most redeveloped web sites in the new year will use it as effectively. I’d say this prediction was quite very good!

Backend as a service

Backend as a service, or BaaS, increased in 2016, as predicted. BaaS is the practice of utilizing third-party solutions to execute particular repetitive tasks for a project — tasks like cloud storage or push notification. By making use of these services, developers can focus on their specialty whilst these services do what they do greatest. Backend API solutions are thriving due to the fact frontend frameworks are changing to far more very easily interact with these solutions. Developers are also increasingly utilizing a method named composition, where an general system is composed of several smaller applications. In such a technique, these little applications are easily supplied by third-party solutions.

I’m intrigued to see how software norms will progress in the coming year.

Note: In my last post I pointed out a well-liked BaaS named Parse. Shortly after the write-up ran, Facebook (its owner) announced that Parse would soon be shut down. These using it will need to have to develop their personal Parse servers and migrate prior to January 28, 2017.

Simple image management and deployment

Services like Docker and Packer became a mainstay of numerous improvement teams in 2016, as predicted. These services enable engineers to swiftly generate and replicate machine photos named containers that bundle a piece of application with runtime, method tools and libraries, and so forth., guaranteeing that it has every thing it wants to run in any environment. Developers can swiftly prototype a project on a lightweight virtual environment with pre-constructed version handle, then very easily deploy the new version on several servers. Server provisioning by hand is inherently tricky and time-consuming, so it’s no surprise that automating this approach has caught on quickly.

Associated tools that grew in reputation final year contain Vagrant (for very easily setting up development environments), and Puppet, Chef and Ansible (for configuration management). Working with container-primarily based systems has turn out to be an integral element of the regular developer’s toolkit. I see no explanation for this to slow down.

Improved reliance on functional programming languages

Functional programming languages like Haskell, Clojure and Scala grew steadily in reputation in the course of 2016. Usage of these server-side languages is driven by explosive development in the quantity of smartphones and connected devices in use, and by our increased expectations of a excellent knowledge on these devices. As our computer systems, tablets, smartphones and IoT gadgets turn into a lot more potent, servers turn out to be the bottlenecks to efficiency. Growing a server’s capability to execute concurrent tasks tends to make it a lot more responsive when interacting with a massive quantity of connected devices. The functional programming model is (largely) stateless, which means that sections of application can far more simply and effectively be run in parallel across distinct CPU cores or machines, without having needing complicated synchronization. This gives the functional paradigm an inherent edge more than the object-oriented approach when undertaking concurrent processing such as internet requests.

Shift toward material design and style and commonality of patterns

Items had been intriguing in 2016 on the visual design front. Not surprisingly, Google incorporated an increasing quantity of material style elements across its whole portfolio — systems (ChromeOS, Android), applications (Chrome, Drive, Google Play Music), web sites (YouTube, AdSense) and even web search. We see material design and style elements in Android apps from Slack, Twitter, Spotify, Airbnb and Wikipedia, and in web sites from Asana, Geekbench and other people. That stated, we didn’t see adoption in other platforms (iOS, Tizen, Windows, MacOS — only a little with Ubuntu). Developers in these other locations pushed forward with styles specific to these platforms, to varying extent.

I give myself only a handful of points of partial credit on that certain prediction from earlier this year. If I’m allowed to recast my design and style prediction for 2017, then I’ll move away from standard style paradigms altogether — toward non-visual interfaces (Amazon Alexa, Siri, Cortana, Google Property) or added-visual interfaces (augmented reality, virtual reality).

Summary

2016 brought a lot of thrilling developments in computer software and 2017 promises to be even greater as containers and functional programming languages develop in adoption and JavaScript moves to turn out to be even far more central parts of regular improvement practice. I’m intrigued to see how software program norms will progress in the coming year and eager to share my thoughts with my fellow developers!

Featured Image: Bernhard Lang/The Image Bank/Getty Pictures
TechCrunch

Have a Note 7? Here Are the Very best Phones to Replace It

Thanks to a series of unfortunate fires, millions of Samsung Galaxy Note 7 owners need to return their phones immediately. In some instances, for the second time. Given that the Galaxy Note 7 is officially out of circulation, in no way to return, you may possibly be questioning what would ideal fill that smartphone-sized hole in your heart. Don’t worry! You have got options. Non-incendiary choices.

Pixel XL ($ 770)

You got the Samsung Galaxy Note 7 since it is a huge, potent Android smartphone, appropriate? The upcoming Pixel XL checks these boxes, has one particular of the greatest cameras on the marketplace, and, along with the smaller Pixel, will be the only Android device to offer Google Assistant, Cupertino’s super-intelligent AI helper, at launch. The large caveat right here is that most models are out of stock, and the a single configuration that’s left (silver, 32GB) has a five-six week shipping time. You do not want to threat utilizing your Note 7 that long, but if you have anything lying round to bridge the gap, Pixel XL’s your best bet.

Credit: Google

You got the Samsung Galaxy Note 7 because it’s a huge, effective Android smartphone, correct? The upcoming Pixel XL checks these boxes, has a single of the greatest cameras on the market place, and, along with the smaller sized Pixel, will be the only Android device to provide Google Assistant, Cupertino’s super-smart AI helper, at launch. The massive caveat right here is that most models are out of stock, and the one particular configuration that’s left (silver, 32GB) has a 5-6 week shipping time. You don’t want to danger employing your Note 7 that extended, but if you have some thing lying round to bridge the gap, Pixel XL’s your greatest bet.

Google Nexus 6P ($ 500)

The Nexus 6P is a year old, but it has the distinct advantage of getting offered proper now. Don’t let that age necessarily put you off it, either it is a solidly built, big-screen, pure Android device with a fantastic camera and a extremely accommodating value. At the quite least, it is a protected bet to tide you more than until anytime the Note eight comes along. Google does not sell it straight any longer, outside of its Project Fi carrier program, but you can snag one particular on Amazon.

Credit: Josh Valcarcel/WIRED

The Nexus 6P is a year old, but it has the distinct benefit of getting offered proper now. Do not let that age necessarily place you off it, either it’s a solidly constructed, big-screen, pure Android device with a fantastic camera and a very accommodating price. At the very least, it’s a secure bet to tide you more than till whenever the Note 8 comes along. Google does not sell it straight any longer, outdoors of its Project Fi carrier program, but you can snag 1 on Amazon.

Apple iPhone 7 Plus ($ 770)

Okay, okay, switching from iOS to Android (and vice versa) comes with its share of headaches. But the iPhone 7 Plus is the absolute ideal big smartphone offered, specially with the Galaxy Note 7 out of commission. You’d be crazy not to at least consider it. Besides, most of your stuff’s in the cloud by now anyway, meaning it might not be as undesirable a transition as you’d believe.

Credit: Lupine Hammak/WIRED

Okay, okay, switching from iOS to Android (and vice versa) comes with its share of headaches. But the iPhone 7 Plus is the absolute greatest massive smartphone available, especially with the Galaxy Note 7 out of commission. You’d be crazy not to at least contemplate it. Besides, most of your stuff’s in the cloud by now anyway, meaning it might not be as poor a transition as you’d believe.

Moto Z Force Droid Edition ($ 720)

The most current Motorola line can be a bit confusing there are 4 different models, that all operate with an array of swappable hardware add-ons. Let us simplify it: If you liked the Note 7, you need to get the Moto Z Force Droid, which has a shatterproof show, 40 hours of battery life, and a souped up camera. Just be aware that it is Verizon-only.

Credit: Motorola

The most recent Motorola line can be a bit confusing there are 4 diverse models, that all function with an array of swappable hardware add-ons. Let us simplify it: If you liked the Note 7, you ought to get the Moto Z Force Droid, which has a shatterproof show, 40 hours of battery life, and a souped up camera. Just be aware that it’s Verizon-only.

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge ($ 770)

If what you liked most about the Note 7 was its size, ignore this. If you are a Samsung fan, even though, and appreciate its TouchWiz computer software touches, you can do a lot worse than the Galaxy S7 Edge. It is like the Note 7’s adorable kid brother, and it won’t singe your carpet. (And with a 5.5-inch curved show, it is nevertheless lots large.)

Credit: JOSH VALCARCEL/WIRED

If what you liked most about the Note 7 was its size, ignore this. If you’re a Samsung fan, even though, and appreciate its TouchWiz application touches, you can do a lot worse than the Galaxy S7 Edge. It is like the Note 7’s adorable kid brother, and it won’t singe your carpet. (And with a five.five-inch curved display, it is nonetheless a lot massive.)

LG V20 ($ 830)

The LG V20’s going to have a meaty five.7-inch display, the really most current Android release, and enough audio/visual add-ons to energy a little studio. It’s also not out until the end of October, so attempt not to schedule any critical telephone calls or app usages between now and then.

Credit: LG

The LG V20’s going to have a meaty 5.7-inch display, the quite most recent Android release, and adequate audio/visual add-ons to energy a modest studio. It’s also not out till the finish of October, so try not to schedule any essential telephone calls or app usages among now and then.

Galaxy Note five ($ 700)

Here’s what you’re sacrificing by opting for last year’s Note: external storage, a quicker processor, and a lot more reliable firmware updates. That is not terrible! And it’s otherwise basically the exact identical telephone you know and enjoy, minus all that unpleasant danger.

Credit: Samsung

Here’s what you are sacrificing by opting for final year’s Note: external storage, a quicker processor, and much more trustworthy firmware updates. That is not terrible! And it is otherwise fundamentally the precise exact same phone you know and adore, minus all that unpleasant danger.

Go Back to Best. Skip To: Start off of Article.

WIRED

The best portable solar battery charger

Who should get this

Honestly, a lot of people hunting for a transportable power answer are going to be greater off beginning with a USB battery pack. Our massive battery pick will keep a smartphone charged every night for a week and is no larger than a paperback novel. But if you cannot be confident of your energy needs, a solar charger could refill a tiny battery pack in a day or straight charge a smartphone in two to 3 hours.

The catch is that these chargers operate only with USB devices, which limits their appeal for those who need them for extended-term, off-grid setups. If that is you, you are going to probably be far more interested in the larger setups from organizations like Aim Zero or Suntactics. In the future, we could review these units, but for now, they’re outdoors the scope of this guide.

How we picked and tested

The Anker (bottom) and the now discontinued runner-up RAVPower (top) each returned to complete-speed charging quickly after getting shaded. Photo: Mark Smirniotis

We started with a pool of solar battery charger contenders culled from Amazon sales and user reviews, as nicely as authoritative review internet sites like OutdoorGearLab. In our survey of far more than 400 readers, more than 40 percent mentioned they would want to be capable to charge a tablet and 59 percent mentioned they wanted to devote much less than $ 75, so we deemed only models that can create at least two amps, and ruled out some more-expensive offerings.

With cloudless, blue Southern California skies and an anticipated higher in the 70s, we set out the panels we chose for testing at roughly a 25-degree angle at 10 a.m. and connected them to a PortaPow V2 Premium USB Energy Monitor and an external USB battery. We disqualified any chargers unable to get back to their maximum output on their personal when shaded. If you determine to leave your telephone and solar charger out all afternoon to absorb some juice even though you happen to be off hiking, you’d be pretty disappointed to find your phone charged for only a total of 15 minutes just before a cloud passed by. That is a dealbreaker.

Due to the fact we had a couple of models that did not carry this quirk, we tested them against one one more to gauge power production. When they performed similarly, we chose the lighter, far more compact of the three competitors as our winner.

Our pick

The PowerPort Solar Lite is the smallest and lightest charger we’ve tested that’s rated at 15 watts. Photo: Mark Smirniotis

If you require power for modest devices when you happen to be away from electrical outlets for far more than a couple of days, the Anker PowerPort Solar Lite has the greatest combination of charging speed, size, and cost. Employed alone, the Anker can fully recharge tiny tablets or one or two smartphones in 1 sunny day. If you pair the Anker with a single of our favored USB battery packs, the combination will have enough juice to preserve your USB-powered gadgets fully charged every single day for as long as necessary. And even though half of the chargers we tested slowed to a crawl when a cloud passed overhead, the Anker resumed complete-speed charging practically immediately following the cloud was gone.

In direct winter sun, our peak measurement was 8.48 watts/1.67 amps, which may possibly appear low compared with the 15 watts/two.1 amps production advertised in the specs. But soon after an whole day charging our test battery, the average 6 watts/1.17 amps got us 85 percent of the way to the total produced by the a lot bigger and heavier RAVPower charger.

The Anker measures about 18 inches lengthy when totally deployed—about half as lengthy as the 31-inch RAVPower, creating it a lot easier to orient toward the sun. Folded up and ready for travel, it measures 11 by six.three inches and weighs just 12.5 ounces. Models any larger never get you sufficient functionality enhance to justify the size, and any smaller sized will not be capable to maintain up with modern, power-hungry gadgets. If something goes wrong, Anker offers solid consumer help, an 18-month warranty, and a track record of top quality energy accessories.

How to get the most from your charger

Producing energy from starlight. Photo: Mark Smirniotis

To actually max out your power output, you will want your panels angled properly. A very good rule of thumb is that the panel’s angle, relative to flat ground, ought to be roughly the same as your latitude, with some minor adjustments in summer time (shallower) or winter (steeper). If you genuinely want to get the most juice, verify sites such as solarpaneltilt.com, pveducation.org, or Solar Electricity Handbook to figure out the best angle prior to you go.

This guide may have been updated by The Wirecutter. To see the existing recommendation, please go right here.

Engadget RSS Feed